Zurück
Score: 11.2Impact: highRisk: medium

Clark v. Sweeney

CourtListener — Latest Opinions2025-11-24 08:00Originalquelle

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TERENCE CLARK, DIRECTOR, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v. JEREMIAH ANTOINE SWEENEY ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–52. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. A Maryland jury found Jeremiah Sweeney guilty of second-degree murder and</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741339/clark-v-sweeney/">Original document</a>

Entitäten

Jeremiah Antoine Sweeney (person)Terence Clark (person)Prince George’s County Department of Corrections (org)Supreme Court of the United States (org)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (org)Clark v. Sweeney (case)
Epiphany IntelCase Relevant: 3%
💡Was ist wirklich neu?

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S.

Warum es wichtig ist
  • High societal impact — significant public interest implications.
  • Moderate risk — warrants continued monitoring.
  • Involves 6 identified entities with cross-connections.
👤Beteiligte Akteure
Jeremiah Antoine Sweeneyperson
Terence Clarkperson
Prince George’s County Department of Correctionsorg
Supreme Court of the United Statesorg
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuitorg
Clark v. Sweeneycase