Score: 7.2Impact: mediumRisk: low

Davenport v. United States

CourtListener — Latest Opinions2025-12-08 08:00Originalquelle →

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ANTONIO NATHANIEL DAVENPORT, JR. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24–7435. Decided December 8, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Statement of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10749075/davenport-v-united-states/">Original document</a>

#hot

Entitäten

Antonio Nathaniel Davenport, Jr. (person)United States (org)Supreme Court of the United States (org)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (org)Davenport v. United States (case)

𝕏X inLinkedIn Telegram

Epiphany Intel

💡Was ist wirklich neu?

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S.

⚡Warum es wichtig ist

▸Moderate impact — may affect ongoing investigations or policy.
▸Involves 5 identified entities with cross-connections.

👤Beteiligte Akteure

Antonio Nathaniel Davenport, Jr.person

United Statesorg

Supreme Court of the United Statesorg

United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuitorg

Davenport v. United Statescase

🔗Links & Kontext

UK court says Palestine Action ban ‘unlawful’: What does the verdict mean?Großbritannien: Gericht wertet Verbot der Gruppe Palestine Action als rechtswidrig Attorney for Epstein Survivors Warns That Justice Is Impossible With Bondi as AG UK ban on Palestine Action was unlawful, says court

#hot

Davenport v. United States

Entitäten

Verwandte Meldungen