Zurück
Score: 11.2Impact: highRisk: medium

Pitts v. Mississippi

CourtListener — Latest Opinions2025-11-24 08:00Originalquelle

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFFREY CLYDE PITTS v. MISSISSIPPI ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 24–1159. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. Ordinarily, the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause “guarantees the defendant a face-to-face meeting with wit- nesses appearing before the trier of fact.” Coy</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741338/pitts-v-mississippi/">Original document</a>

Entitäten

Jeffrey Clyde Pitts (person)Mississippi (place)Supreme Court of the United States (org)Supreme Court of Mississippi (org)Sixth Amendment (document)Pitts v. Mississippi (case)
Epiphany Intel
💡Was ist wirklich neu?

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S.

Warum es wichtig ist
  • High societal impact — significant public interest implications.
  • Moderate risk — warrants continued monitoring.
  • Involves 6 identified entities with cross-connections.
👤Beteiligte Akteure
Jeffrey Clyde Pittsperson
Mississippiplace
Supreme Court of the United Statesorg
Supreme Court of Mississippiorg
Sixth Amendmentdocument
Pitts v. Mississippicase