Back
Score: 7.2Impact: mediumRisk: low

Case v. Montana

CourtListener — Latest Opinions2026-01-14 08:00Original source

<p>(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10774335/case-v-montana/">Original document</a>

Entities

Montana (place)United States (org)Detroit Timber (case)Reporter of Decisions (org)OCTOBER TERM, 2025 (document)
Epiphany Intel
💡What's actually new?

<p>(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader.

Why it matters
  • Moderate impact — may affect ongoing investigations or policy.
  • Involves 5 identified entities with cross-connections.
👤Actors involved
Montanaplace
United Statesorg
Detroit Timbercase
Reporter of Decisionsorg
OCTOBER TERM, 2025document