Back
Score: 11.2Impact: highRisk: medium

Clark v. Sweeney

CourtListener — Latest Opinions2025-11-24 08:00Original source

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TERENCE CLARK, DIRECTOR, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v. JEREMIAH ANTOINE SWEENEY ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–52. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. A Maryland jury found Jeremiah Sweeney guilty of second-degree murder and</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741339/clark-v-sweeney/">Original document</a>

Entities

Jeremiah Antoine Sweeney (person)Terence Clark (person)Prince George’s County Department of Corrections (org)Supreme Court of the United States (org)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (org)Maryland (place)Clark v. Sweeney (case)
Epiphany IntelCase Relevant: 3%
💡What's actually new?

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S.

Why it matters
  • High societal impact — significant public interest implications.
  • Moderate risk — warrants continued monitoring.
  • Involves 7 identified entities with cross-connections.
👤Actors involved
Jeremiah Antoine Sweeneyperson
Terence Clarkperson
Prince George’s County Department of Correctionsorg
Supreme Court of the United Statesorg
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuitorg
Marylandplace