Back
Score: 14.2Impact: highRisk: medium

Klein v. Martin

CourtListener — Latest Opinions2026-01-26 08:00Original source

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHRISTOPHER KLEIN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF DETENTION FACILITIES FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, ET AL. v. CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–51. Decided January 26, 2026 PER CURIAM. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10779476/klein-v-martin/">Original document</a>

Entities

Christopher Klein (person)Charles Brandon Martin (person)Oberster Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten (org)Department of Detention Facilities for Anne Arundel County (org)United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (org)Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (document)Klein v. Martin (case)
Epiphany Intel
💡What's actually new?

<p>Cite as: 607 U. S.

Why it matters
  • High societal impact — significant public interest implications.
  • Moderate risk — warrants continued monitoring.
  • Involves 7 identified entities with cross-connections.
👤Actors involved
Christopher Kleinperson
Charles Brandon Martinperson
Oberster Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staatenorg
Department of Detention Facilities for Anne Arundel Countyorg
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuitorg
Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Actdocument