Klein v. Martin
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHRISTOPHER KLEIN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF DETENTION FACILITIES FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, ET AL. v. CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–51. Decided January 26, 2026 PER CURIAM. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10779476/klein-v-martin/">Original document</a>
Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy, LLC
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN DOE v. DYNAMIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT No. 25–180. Decided December 8, 2025 PER CURIAM. Louisiana immunizes healthcare providers from civil lia- bility during public health emergencies. La. Rev. Stat.</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10749076/doe-v-dynamic-physical-therapy-llc/">Original document</a>
Clark v. Sweeney
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TERENCE CLARK, DIRECTOR, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v. JEREMIAH ANTOINE SWEENEY ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–52. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. A Maryland jury found Jeremiah Sweeney guilty of second-degree murder and</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741339/clark-v-sweeney/">Original document</a>
Pitts v. Mississippi
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFFREY CLYDE PITTS v. MISSISSIPPI ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 24–1159. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. Ordinarily, the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause “guarantees the defendant a face-to-face meeting with wit- nesses appearing before the trier of fact.” Coy</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741338/pitts-v-mississippi/">Original document</a>
Veneno v. United States
In the case of Veneno v. United States, the Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of certiorari. Justice Gorsuch, joined by Justice Thomas, dissented from this denial. The case originated from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit and was decided on November 10, 2025.
Howell v. Circuit Court of Indiana
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 JACKSON, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES INDIANA, EX REL. DANNY W. HOWELL v. CIRCUIT COURT OF INDIANA, WELLS COUNTY, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA No. 25–5557. Decided January 20, 2026 The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10776750/howell-v-circuit-court-of-indiana/">Original document</a>
Davenport v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ANTONIO NATHANIEL DAVENPORT, JR. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24–7435. Decided December 8, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Statement of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10749075/davenport-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Beck v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KARI BECK, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CAMERON GAYLE BECK, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 24–1078. Decided November 24, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE GORSUCH would grant</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741382/beck-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Hutson v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SUSAN HUTSON v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 24–1022. Decided November 17, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE GORSUCH would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10737437/hutson-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Frequently Asked Questions
Q:What is Klein v. Martin about?
Klein v. Martin is a case for which a petition for certiorari has been filed, seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Q:What is Howell v. Circuit Court of Indiana about?
Howell v. Circuit Court of Indiana is a case for which a petition for certiorari has been filed, seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Q:What is Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy, LLC about?
Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy, LLC is a case for which a petition for certiorari has been filed, seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Q:What is Davenport v. United States about?
Davenport v. United States is a case for which a petition for certiorari has been filed, seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
Q:What is Clark v. Sweeney about?
Clark v. Sweeney is a case for which a petition for certiorari has been filed, seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.