USA verharmlosen Treibhausgase: Entsetzen und Wut nach Donald Trumps Klimakeule
Donald Trump weicht die Regeln für den Klimaschutz in den USA drastisch auf. Von seinem Vorgänger Barack Obama kommt scharfe Kritik. Der Fall könnte vor dem Supreme Court landen. Dann wird es spannend.
USA verharmlosen Treibhausgase: Entsetzen und Wut nach Donald Trumps Klimakeule
Donald Trump weicht die Regeln für den Klimaschutz in den USA drastisch auf. Von seinem Vorgänger Barack Obama kommt scharfe Kritik. Der Fall könnte vor dem Supreme Court landen. Dann wird es spannend.
EPA kills foundation of greenhouse gas regulations
The agency is betting the the Supreme Court will reverse a prior ruling.
On Trump’s Tariffs, Supreme Court Hurries Up and Waits
The justices put the case on a fast track at the administration’s urging. But they don’t seem in a rush to rule on the president’s signature economic program.
Klein v. Martin
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES CHRISTOPHER KLEIN, SUPERINTENDENT, DEPARTMENT OF DETENTION FACILITIES FOR ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY, ET AL. v. CHARLES BRANDON MARTIN ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–51. Decided January 26, 2026 PER CURIAM. Under the Antiterrorism and Effective</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10779476/klein-v-martin/">Original document</a>
Trump v. Illinois
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 25A443 _________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. ILLINOIS, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [December 23, 2025] Federal immigration-enforcement efforts have encoun- tered significant resistance, as well as some</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10766642/trump-v-illinois/">Original document</a>
Trump v. Illinois
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 25A443 _________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. ILLINOIS, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [December 23, 2025] Federal immigration-enforcement efforts have encoun- tered significant resistance, as well as some</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10764200/trump-v-illinois/">Original document</a>
Doe v. Dynamic Physical Therapy, LLC
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JOHN DOE v. DYNAMIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, LLC, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL OF LOUISIANA, FIRST CIRCUIT No. 25–180. Decided December 8, 2025 PER CURIAM. Louisiana immunizes healthcare providers from civil lia- bility during public health emergencies. La. Rev. Stat.</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10749076/doe-v-dynamic-physical-therapy-llc/">Original document</a>
Abbott v. League of United Latin American Citizens
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 25A608 _________________ GREG ABBOTT, ET AL. v. LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [December 4, 2025] With an eye on the upcoming 2026 midterm elections, several States have in recent months redrawn their</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10747783/abbott-v-league-of-united-latin-american-citizens/">Original document</a>
Clark v. Sweeney
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES TERENCE CLARK, DIRECTOR, PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL. v. JEREMIAH ANTOINE SWEENEY ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 25–52. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. A Maryland jury found Jeremiah Sweeney guilty of second-degree murder and</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741339/clark-v-sweeney/">Original document</a>
Pitts v. Mississippi
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Per Curiam SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES JEFFREY CLYDE PITTS v. MISSISSIPPI ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 24–1159. Decided November 24, 2025 PER CURIAM. Ordinarily, the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause “guarantees the defendant a face-to-face meeting with wit- nesses appearing before the trier of fact.” Coy</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741338/pitts-v-mississippi/">Original document</a>
Howell v. Circuit Court of Indiana
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2026) 1 JACKSON, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES INDIANA, EX REL. DANNY W. HOWELL v. CIRCUIT COURT OF INDIANA, WELLS COUNTY, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA No. 25–5557. Decided January 20, 2026 The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10776750/howell-v-circuit-court-of-indiana/">Original document</a>
Davenport v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ANTONIO NATHANIEL DAVENPORT, JR. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24–7435. Decided December 8, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Statement of JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR respecting the denial of certiorari.</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10749075/davenport-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Beck v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 Statement of SOTOMAYOR, J. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES KARI BECK, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF CAMERON GAYLE BECK, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 24–1078. Decided November 24, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE GORSUCH would grant</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10741382/beck-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Hutson v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 ALITO, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES SUSAN HUTSON v. UNITED STATES, ET AL. ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 24–1022. Decided November 17, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE GORSUCH would grant the petition for a writ of certiorari. JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10737437/hutson-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Barrett v. United States Revisions: 1/14/26
<p>(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2025 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10774608/barrett-v-united-states-revisions-11426/">Original document</a>
Veneno v. United States
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 GORSUCH, J., dissenting SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES QUENTIN VENENO, JR. v. UNITED STATES ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT No. 24–5191. Decided November 10, 2025 The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. JUSTICE GORSUCH, with whom JUSTICE THOMAS joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. Petitioner</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10734087/veneno-v-united-states/">Original document</a>
Trump v. Orr
<p>Cite as: 607 U. S. ____ (2025) 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________ No. 25A319 _________________ DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. ASHTON ORR, ET AL. ON APPLICATION FOR STAY [November 6, 2025] This case concerns an Executive Branch policy requiring all new passports to display an individual’s</p><br> <a href="/opinion/10732118/trump-v-orr/">Original document</a>
Häufige Fragen
Q:Was sind die Reaktionen auf Donald Trumps Umgang mit Treibhausgasen?
Es gibt Entsetzen und Wut über die Verharmlosung von Treibhausgasen in den USA.
Q:Was hat die EPA kürzlich beschlossen?
Die EPA hat die Grundlage für die Regulierung von Treibhausgasen abgeschafft.
Q:Was ist das Thema des Falls 'Klein v. Martin'?
Der Fall 'Klein v. Martin' befasst sich mit rechtlichen Fragen, die vor Gericht geklärt werden müssen.
Q:Was ist der aktuelle Stand zu Trumps Zöllen vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof?
Der Oberste Gerichtshof hat in Bezug auf Trumps Zölle eine abwartende Haltung eingenommen.
Q:Was behandelt der Fall 'Trump v. Illinois'?
Der Fall 'Trump v. Illinois' behandelt rechtliche Auseinandersetzungen, die mit der Politik von Donald Trump verbunden sind.